PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance”
PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance”

The Irrelevance of Relevance

If someone told you they knew how to measure creativity, they’d likely have won a number of awards for their work in doing so.

They’d also likely have graced the “stocks to watch” sections of huge global financial publications. They would have been the subjects of those Leibovitz-esque cover shoots, their elbows set on the shoulders of their business partners, smug looks and all, leaning against a perfectly paint-splattered chair or ladder, almost royal-like, with the headline “Ruling Creativity.”

Unfortunately, here we sit knowing full well that the only ruler here is creativity itself, the magic to which we creatives are ultimately beholden. Still, this doesn’t stop us from suggesting the very factors against which we hope our creative endeavours will be measured.

When we asked those in our survey to choose one metric that best captures how they’d like creativity to be measured, the results suggested we, as a group, are keen to know our work actually means something.

Almost 40% of respondents said that “positive impact” is key. “Measurement needs to look at a number of angles, with positive impact being at the top and the rest feeding into it,” says Mark Liney, the group CEO at DesignStudio, a London-based agency.

As for the rest, a distant second was “category defining,” with slightly more than 13%. And, perhaps one of the most telling is the placement of “awards” as a measure of creativity, which came in dead last, with 0%.

But the trickiest of the bunch was “relevancy to customer,” not for how it indexed in our survey, at slightly more than 11%, but how respondents addressed it in their explanations about our original question:

“How do you measure creativity?”
PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance”
PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance”

Standing in the shoes

But choosing one way of measuring creativity is actually quite hard. And it almost becomes an exercise in splitting hairs i.e. any one thing on our list of possible measurements can actually be split a number of ways.

“I chose positive impact because it's probably the most generic thing on the list; to deliver positive outcomes in a multitude of different ways,” says Simon Elliott, founder of Rose Design, a London-based agency. “I think that that's not to say there weren't others on the list that we felt were highly relevant.”

A number of our respondents explained that things like measuring financial gain are certainly near the top of the list for commercial clients. By contrast, for cultural sector charities, or public sector organizations, financial sustainability is a huge aspect of what they do, but positive impact and relevance to customers is huge too.

But when this group specifies relevance to customers it can mean either the client or the actual audience the work was intended for.

“If a design team is bringing us in and there's a senior designer or creative director, if we can do right by them, we're making them look good, you know, it's job security for them,” says Brent Couchman, founder and creative director at Moniker, a San Francisco-based agency.

In many instances, it’s safe to assume that every brief has two audiences for which the creative outputs need to be relevant. “What I like is the confidence to know that your work truly makes a difference and not just to the client,” says Simon Dixon, co-founder at DixonBaxi, a London-based agency.

PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance”
PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance”

The fight between light and dark

Our findings also made it clear that a good number of creatives felt a sense of futility in trying to assess how we might measure creativity’s worth. But what felt less futile was the assumption that our metrics for measuring creativity in 2022 have changed, even in a matter of years.

“I never thought as a young graphic designer that I could have the audacity to say that we can use design for good or do anything other than just deliver against the client’s brief. Now we go way, way, way further than that,” says David Johnston, founder of Accept & Proceed, a London-based agency.

Now it’s commonplace for creative minds to be at the table with big decision makers, driving whole enterprises forward, helping them think differently about the organizations they run and work with. Johhnston says that’s a clear marker that creativity is, in this moment, seen as a way to drive positive impact, and that it’s a sign of the times.

“Doesn't it feel a bit like we're watching this kind of slow motion collapse of global society?” he asks. “I am by nature an optimist, but it feels like it's almost a fight between light and dark and I feel that if our work can be having a positive impact and thereby creating more light in the world, which I think is possible — which is audacious.”

PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance”
PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance”

Conclusion

One of the great things about creativity is that it’s a vehicle to an end; the “how” of problem solving. And, the beauty of courageous and big minds is that they all have their own way of tackling a brief. Given this, it’s no surprise that while some of our respondents overlapped on their answers for measuring creativity, the nuances and variety in their answers is the thing that should give us hope for what’s to come.
What’s even more encouraging is that “fame” and “awards” were at the bottom of the list. As Dixon so eloquently put it,
“It's great to win awards and all that kind of stuff. But, yeah, I think you've got to be careful about the clock of bullshit that comes with this stuff.”
So maybe the cover story isn’t what we’re after, after all.
PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance”
PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance” PART (4): “The Irrelevance of Relevance”
See what we do
Edition 01.2022

We turned 10 last year, and whilst considering what we could do to mark the occasion, a sub-title stood out on the office wall, reading: ‘creativity is the last competitive advantage’.

A discussion circled around that idea for some time — we run a business that effectively trades in the stuff, connecting brands looking for the best creative thinking with agencies who are able to offer it. We see, more than anyone, the resources market-leading businesses are putting behind partnering with the best creative minds — it's clearly recognised that harnessing it properly will bring real value, that it's now a must-have vs the nice-to-have it once was.

Some of the most in-demand agencies are booked up for 6 months at a time — the cost for top talent is at an all-time high — tech giants are offering banker-like six-figure salaries to designers and product leads who just a few years ago would be biting the hand off anyone who would pay them a comfortable five figure wage. And the management consultancies are even on board, buying up agencies and publishing thought-pieces titled 'The Business Value of Design' and 'Creating Creativity: A Leader’s Guide' (yikes).

It’s gold dust basically, yet ask someone to define what it is, exactly, and the conversation pings in a thousand different directions. Conscious of the fact the world doesn’t need another white paper - we’ll leave that to the aforementioned consulting groups - we’ve instead tasked ourselves with a mission to seek out and better understand how the world’s best creative minds think about the subject (creativity as a currency) and begin to explore what we can learn from their thinking. We’re keen to know how can we measure it, how it is evolving, how it impacts the world we live in and how it can be leveraged beyond business to address critical questions on race, culture, economy and the environment…

These are huge topics, of course, and whilst very much not wanting to over-claim, we believe we are a business that is truly best-placed to unpack them. Not because we believe we have the answers, but because the people we champion do. We sit at the intersection of the world’s most forward thinking businesses and a globally minded set of the creative 'top 1%’ — a sort of gateway to creative excellence — with relationships that afford us the simple but rare luxury of being able to ask the questions.

And that’s exactly what we’ve done. Through extensive surveying and countless hours of interviews with 50+ of the creative industry’s finest, we’ve started to paint a qualitative and quantitative picture of the current creative landscape. We used bleeding-edge AI tools to evaluate a myriad of different responses and a team of editors to extract themes and form takeaways that, we hope, will be useful to anyone who values creativity in the way we do; as the last true competitive advantage, and something we, and the world, could all do with more of.

Thank you to everyone involved in the making of this, we’re humbled by the time and energy people have been willing to give, and very much hope this inspires you in the way it has us.

Celebrating 10 and seeing this as very much the start,

The AUFI team